Already a member?
Sign in
Welcome! Wikis are websites that everyone can build together. It's easy!
Location: Blades
Threads
???keywordTags???
???noTags???
Posting...
Note: You can enter up to [REMCHARS] additional characters.
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
Did you know you can edit the content of this page by clicking EasyEdit?
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Badrek | 10G Blades with HItachi Data Systems Storage USP600 Interoperability | 0 | Jul 7 2008, 2:41 AM EDT by Badrek | |||
|
Thread started: Jul 7 2008, 2:41 AM EDT
Watch
Need to know whether our QME2472/Emulex Lpe-1105-M4 is interoperable with Hitachi Storage. Qlogic and Emelux has only EMC approved Drivers . Checked with Hitachi and they were unable to find one. Do you guys can help getting me a driver?
|
||||||
| brian_summers | CMC GUI | 7 | Jun 10 2008, 11:25 AM EDT by scott_hanson | |||
 |
Thread started: Jan 24 2008, 12:47 PM EST
Watch
Is there a "simulation demo" for the CMC GUI?
Like the simulator we have for the MD3000 mgmt GUI :-)
Show Last Reply
|
|||||
| buffalobills | single CPU blades | 1 | May 20 2008, 2:37 AM EDT by sf_alpha | |||
|
Thread started: Apr 28 2008, 8:55 PM EDT
Watch
a customer asked: " is it even possible to take these blades down to single CPU configuration like the 1950's were - I ask because we have an application that is licensed per CPU / per core... and 2 - quads per server is "too much cpu"... - is it possible through the bios of the blade to "off line" a cpu? "
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Keyword tags:
blades
single cpu
Show Last Reply
|
||||||
| sf_alpha | Storage within blade | 2 | May 1 2008, 7:49 PM EDT by aaron_hanson | |||
 |
Thread started: Apr 19 2008, 12:59 AM EDT
Watch
Will dell release any storage solution within blade ?
After study the whitepaper and compared to HP c-class system. Dell have no passive connection between blade and it only possible with I/O modules. But with some kind of SAS fabric module, it even can build whole storage solution using this blade enclosure. Consider storage blade using double-width, we got 2 x4 SAS connection to *each* I/O module act as in/out (or 4 x4 SAS but need 2 I/O module for redundancy). That fabric connect each half-height slot 1-in, 2-out, 3-in, 4-out, 5-in 6-out. Now it possible to get rid of MDx000 enclosure ;-) Does dell working on these ideas ?
Show Last Reply
|
|||||
| brian_summers | DC Evironment | 2 | Apr 28 2008, 8:57 PM EDT by buffalobills | |||
|
|
Thread started: Apr 22 2008, 12:51 PM EDT
Watch
Hi everyone,
My customer (Andrew) and I have a question. He's very close to a purchase on the new M1000e enclosure but has will have to convert DC to AC to make it work. He specific questions are as follows.... "Cost of 220Volt AC inverter system?" >I've checked with Liebert...there working on this. Any other vendors that I could ask? "How much inefficiency does the inverting solution add - the inverting solution may be very efficient, but the overall conversion from 48volt DC to 220volt AC then back to the DC voltages inside the blade enclosure can add up to be quite inefficient overall. A blade enclosure that runs natively from 48volt DC power will be far more efficient without the need for the 220volt AC inverting steps." >I'd love to have anyone that's up for it jump on a call with Andrew and myself :-)
Show Last Reply
|
|||||
| brian_summers | #'s around hotter air | 2 | Apr 21 2008, 5:51 PM EDT by laytonjb | |||
|
|
Thread started: Mar 6 2008, 2:09 PM EST
Watch
As I understand the "cooling" for the M1000e our energy smart design enables a better performance per watt, but yields "more" heat to the hot isle in a datacenter compared to HP chassis.
Logic dictatates that this heat will be adequately "re-cooled" as it makes its way back to the cold isle and back throught the front of the chassis. That said, do we have documentation of the heat being "adequatley re-cooled"?
Show Last Reply
|
|||||
