Sign in or 

| Dell-KongY | Thursday's 3 PM chat will be the main course. |
| ceri | Thursday is part 2? |
| Dell-KongY | @ceri, yes part 2 is iSCSI Security and Best Practices. We have confirmed three big-time players in Dell iSCSI strategy for part 2 |
| ceri | Oh, cool. Will we discuss Ipsec? |
| Dell-KongY | You'll have a face-to-face chat with a technical director, storage strategist, and CTO technologist at Thursday's chat for sure :) |
| ceri | Ace. |
| Dell-KongY | Today is just virtualization and iSCSI in general. With focus on Dell's business ready configurations |
| ceri | I've read that paper, looked good |
| Dell-KongY | Awesome |
| Dell-KongY | Speak of the man…gents, let me introduce Brian Sitton. He's one of the lead engineers from Dell PG who designed the business-ready configuration |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Brian |
| Dell-BrianS | Thanks |
| ceri | Hello Brian, was saying I'd read that paper on the weekend. Was a good read |
| Dell-KongY | Brian was also instrumental in putting together the networking paper as well |
| Dell-BrianS | Glad it was useful |
| DELL-ScottH | Hello Brian! |
| Dell-KongY | www.delltechcenter.com/page/dell+virtualization+engineering+white+papers |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome T_moore! welcome Agldave! |
| AGLDave | Howdy |
| Dell-KongY | http://i.dell.com/sites/content/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/documents/brc_vi3_blades_eql.pdf |
| Dell-KongY | Please right-click and open in new window; otherwise, it will kick you from the chat |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Sthersh |
| sthersh | Hi |
| Dell-KongY | You can also select Action, Recent Room History to get recent chat dialogue |
| erson | Hi all |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Erson! |
| Dell-KongY | http://i.dell.com/sites/content/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/documents/networkingguide_vi3_blades.pdf |
| Dell-KongY | Alright, I guess we can get started. Welcome everyone. Today's chat is on iSCSI and virtualization with a focus on Dell's business-ready configurations. I have with me the regular TechCenter SMEs, Jeff and Scott |
| erson | Hi Jeff |
| Dell-KongY | In addition, we have Brian Sitton, systems engineer from Dell's Virtualization Solution Engineering team. Brian was one of the lead engineers who designed and delivered Dell's business-ready configuration for ESX 3.5 U4. He's also working on the vSphere 4 bundle |
| ceri | Could Brian maybe explain how this would change, if at all, for vSphere? |
| Dell-BrianS | vSphere has some interesting new features. Jumbo Frames for one |
| Dell-JeffS | Hey Erson |
| Dell-BrianS | It also has a new storage architecture that allows multiple kernel network connections, and round-robin load balancing. Practically, that means you don't have to use Etherchannel anymore for the iSCSI load balancing |
| Dell-KongY | Before I forget, this chat is part one of a two-part series focused around iSCSI |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome D_glynn! |
| ceri | Etherchannel was to avoid the single session per target? |
| DELL-ScottH | Hello puneet ! |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Puneet Dhawan! |
| erson | Brians, is that MPIO? |
| Dell-BrianS | Yes, MPIO |
| Dell_PuneetDhawan | Thanks guys. Good to be back on TechCenter chat |
| Dell-d_glynn | Hey Kong, I was catching up on the history |
| Dell-KongY | Puneet is a systems engineer from the Dell VSE team, and he is leading another effort on the Dell business-ready configurations |
| erson | So Hyper-V had at least one feature first then... ;) |
| ceri | Ok, thanks Brian. Very useful |
| Dell-d_glynn | :D |
| Dell-KongY | He also was kind enough to share his design on PowerVault MD3000i and vSphere: www.delltechcenter.com/page/vmware+esx+4.0+and+powervault+md3000i |
| ceri | Shall I go again? ;-) |
| Dell-KongY | Again this is the first part of a two-part series |
| Dell-KongY | Please do, Ceri |
| Dell-KongY | The Second part will be a discussion on iSCSI security and best practices led by Jeff S |
| ceri | Okay, the business ready configurations obviously use a lot of I/O modules; if 10GbE were involved, I assume that most of those could go away and VLAN tagging could be used more heavily instead. Any problems with that as a principle? |
| Dell-KongY | Featured will be Dell's EqualLogic Director, Dell's EqualLogic storage strategist, and a Dell technologist |
| Dell-BrianS | No, that sounds like the correct approach for adding 10GbE to that configuration. We are currently talking about it, but I don't know yet if we will be doing lab work with that configuration |
| ceri | That's exactly what I wanted to hear (since it's what I have in my design documentation!) Thanks |
| Dell-KongY | @ceri, please do tell about your design doc ;) |
| Dell-KongY | So how many folks here are using iSCSI and virtualization in their current environments? |
| ceri | I'm at the beginning of spec'ing the next two years worth of ESX infrastructure for my organization; we use FC for storage at the moment, but I want to be able to add in either NFS or iSCSI at a later date |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome, rogerlund! |
| rogerlund | Me |
| erson | Roger lund, you got to be from Sweden? |
| erson | /me holds up both hands to Kongy’s question |
| ceri | So I am going 10GbE because it a) is cheaper with many networks and b) lets me be lazy |
| rogerlund | No, but maybe some distant relative |
| erson | But I should need some recommendations for switches for my SAN network |
| ceri | Just wanted to check that I would have the future flexibility I thought I was going to get ;-) |
| rogerlund | Cisco 3750s. Gig switches of course |
| Dell-BrianS | I really like the idea of 10GbE |
| erson | Rogerlund, only PowerConnect at this shop I'm afraid |
| Dell-BrianS | I have been happy with our 6248 switches. PowerConnect that is |
| erson | But the upgrade path for 10GbE could be a problem with 6224/48 |
| Dell-BrianS | For our bundle testing we used 6220 with 10 GB modules in our client chassis connected to the Cisco modules in our bundle chassis |
| rogerlund | Cisco Catalyst 4900m |
| erson | Wasn't there some chatter a while ago about the 6220 not being suitable for iSCSI because of small buffers or something along those lines? |
| Dell-BrianS | Not sure about the iSCSI, I have not heard that chatter |
| Dell-KongY | @erson, how many 10GbE ports do you need? |
| erson | Chatter was on Dell TechCenter discussions |
| Dell-BrianS | Maybe that will add some urgency to my request to do some lab testing with them ;=) |
| rogerlund | What’s best IOPS / MBS with something like I/O Meter, and the new DS Series, with 15,000 SAS drives? What about 1GbE versus 10GbE? |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Matt_carpenter |
| rogerlund | www.cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6021/brochure_cat_4900__model_comparison.html |
| erson | Kongy, none today, but I'm keeping fabric c open for 10GbE expansion |
| ceri | So what kind of aggregation options do I have with Dell and 10GbE? No desire to buy a 10GbE switch port per blade, so would need some kind of uplink option |
| Dell-KongY | @erson, understood |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Tonygras |
| erson | I'm guessing there's no idea with 10GbE on an EqualLogic PS6000E so that will probably not be an available upgrade |
| tonyhgras | Hi everybody |
| Dell-BrianS | Back to the 6220 and iSCSI. I think maybe the early firmware had some issues, but the latest firmware resolved them. I believe the 6220 is now certified by Dell EqualLogic |
| erson | Ceri, 6220 is your only option. M8024 is 10GbE only |
| Dell-BrianS | The 6220 can have two add-in modules |
| erson | Yes |
| Dell-JeffS | Hey Tony |
| Dell-BrianS | The first module is either stacking, or 10GbE |
| ceri | Okay, note to self: do not open new tab in this window |
| tonyhgras | Hey jeff |
| Dell-BrianS | The second module is 10GbE only |
| erson | Ceri, as long as we're talking PowerConnect, I'm sure there are Cisco options available as well |
| Dell-KongY | @rogerlund, do you mean PS series enclosures? |
| ceri | Erson, I am talking whatever gets the job done ;-) |
| Dell-BrianS | For our client chassis we use a stack of 4 6220s, with up to 8–10GbE uplinks |
| tonyhgras | Do you have any recommendation against the use of 6224/48 switches for iSCSI? |
| rogerlund | Yes, on 10GbE swtich, best I/O per Mb continuous transfer rate with a PS with 15,000 rpm drives |
| Dell-BrianS | Yes |
| tonyhgras | It's a fact that you need stackable switches for iSCSI, right? |
| Dell-BrianS | For the Cisco modules have similar 10GbE uplink options |
| tonyhgras | I mean for EqualLogic |
| Dell-BrianS | Stackable switches for iSCSI is no longer an absolute requirement for optimal connectivity; no longer required for VMware 4.0, that is. I guess I'm getting a little ahead |
| ceri | Basically, I can get away with a pair of 10GbE uplinks from the blade chassis, I think. Preferably one each from a separate I/O module |
| tonyhgras | Well, what change in that particular? |
| Dell-BrianS | There is a requirement from EqualLogic for connectivity between switches |
| Dell-KongY | @rogerlund, each GbE port on an EqualLogic PS6000 can do 100mbps+ for sequential operations |
| Dell-BrianS | We used the stacking connector, but I believe that you can also use 10GbE links between the switches |
| tonyhgras | There's a requirement for EqualLogic arrays that is difficult to meet without stacking the switches—all the ports in the same LAN |
| Dell-BrianS | Ceri, yes, you can use a couple of 10GbE uplinks. We are looking at some of those connectivity options for our 4.0 update to the papers |
| ceri | Dell-brians, just found the M6220 documentation, thanks ;-) M6220 is not 10GbE to the blade though, correct? |
| Dell-BrianS | Tonyhgras, what is wrong with using 10GbE uplinks, instead of stacking modules? |
| erson | Ceri, nope, only GbE |
| erson | s/nope/yes |
| Dell-BrianS | Ceri, M6220 is 1GbE to blade, correct |
| ceri | Ack. Okay, M8024 |
| Dell-BrianS | 8024 is 10GbE all the way. You can have up to eight 10GbE uplink ports, if you use Fiber, or six if you use CX4 copper |
| tonyhgras | The problem is in using Lags from ESX |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome brett! |
| erson | Isn't it about time that you guys start hinting about upcoming PC models? ;) |
| ceri | Looks expensive ;-) |
| Dell-KongY | Welcome Hoosiercab! |
| Dell-BrianS | Tony is correct for ESX 3.5; that goes away with 4.0 |
| tonyhgras | Good to hear that |
| Dell-BrianS | Ceri, not as expensive as some... |
| erson | Brians, with 10G base-T it's only 4 right? On the M8024? |
| rogerlund | The above 4900 can do 24 10GbE ports max. |
| Dell-BrianS | Two modules, three ports on each module for uplink, for copper |
| erson | When copper = CX4? |
| tonyhgras | So, basically what change in 4.0 in iSCSI MPIO? |
| Dell-BrianS | Tonyhgras, yes, MPIO |
| tonyhgras | Can 4.0 do load balancing over iSCSI? |
| ceri | Dell-brians, think I'll be looking for a quote tomorrow ;-) |
| Dell-KongY | @ceri :) and @brians way to go! |
| erson | Ceri, I was quoted about $3300 for the M8024 |
| ceri | Erson, really? That is decent |
| erson | Yeah |
| ceri | Dell-kongy, doesn't follow that I'm going to buy it ;-) |
| Dell-BrianS | Does that $3300 include any uplink modules? |
| erson | No |
| rogerlund | www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?edc=1392267&enkwrd=allprod%3acisco+catalyst+4900m#ts |
| erson | M8024 port configuration and modules; 24 auto-sensing 1/10GbE switching ports available; 16 internal server 1/10GbE ports; flexible media choices for up to two external 10GbE uplink modules per switch; 4-port SFP+ 10GbE module; 3-port CX4 10GbE copper module; 2-port 10GbE Base-T copper RJ45 module |
| erson | SFP+ is slowly but surely taking over the 10GbE space |
| ceri | Yeah, we are all Fibre. Are those uplink modules hot-swap? |
| Dell-BrianS | I had not seen the two-port RJ45 |
| erson | Really nice to have the SFP+DA replacing CX4 as well |
| erson | /me is hoping that the replacement for PC 6200 series will at least have the same module configuration as the M8024 |
| Dell-BrianS | No one else is speaking up, so I will have to say, I don't think the module is hot-swappable, but I don't know for sure. |
| ceri | Doesn't really matter, someone will ask me, that's all! |
| tonyhgras | Is the M8024 of any use for iSCSI right now? |
| erson | The M8024 is hot swappable |
| ceri | So I can get a pair of M8024s, a pair of pass-through GbE modules and something for FC in a PowerEdge M1000e, correct? |
| erson | Yes. Make sure you get the matching mezzanine cards as well, obviously |
| ceri | Okay, sold :) |
| Dell-BrianS | And the LOM will of course be 1GbE |
| tonyhgras | The M8024 is cheaper than the Ciscos? |
| erson | For sure |
| tonyhgras | Even the 3130g? |
| ceri | Dell-brians, the LOM on which component? I'm not all that au fait with Dell hardware (yet), sorry |
| erson | Tonyhgras, I think I've never seen a Cisco switch in the $3300 range, so probably yes. Maybe now that they took over Linksys switches and made them their SMB segment |
| erson | Ceri, LAN On Motherboard. Two on the half-height blades and four on the full height |
| Dell-BrianS | The onboard NICs on all the servers are 1GbE. Those will connect to I/O module A1 and A2 in the blade chassis |
| tonyhgras | Thanks Erson. Anyway, the models for the blade enclosure are very limited |
| ceri | Erson, ah, yes. That's what I was thinking; I need the pass-through I/O modules for |
| erson | The PowerEdge R710 blade is a winner in my book with its 18 DIMM slots. The full-height blades have redundant mezzanine cards as well...something the half-height blades don't have, which would mean up to four 10GbE ports on a PowerEdge R710...perfect for redundant connections to iSCSI and internal network |
| tonyhgras | Just a general question, what are people doing for connecting to iSCSI SANs from the blades; do they use integrated switches, or external ones? |
| erson | Tonyhgras, usually external ones...it's a much more flexible solution |
| ceri | I can't find a PowerEdge R710 blade. You mean the PowerEdge M710? |
| erson | Ceri, of course...PowerEdge M710... M = blades and R = rack |
| Dell-BrianS | The limitation in internal switches is the physical number of 1GbE ports |
| tonyhgras | Think so, and that leads to the second question: which ones? |
| Dell-KongY | A very nice document put out by Brians and team on networking with PowerEdge M1000e: http://i.dell.com/sites/content/business/solutions/engineering-docs/en/documents/networkingguide_vi3_blades.pdf |
| ceri | Erson, okay, was confused ;-) |
| erson | Tonyhgras, I'm leaning toward two 6224s |
| tonyhgras | Or his big brother, 6248 |
| erson | /me has a PowerEdge M1000e and a PowerVault MD3000i and an EqualLogic PS6000e |
| Dell-KongY | me thinks we need a topic on networking, interconnects, and switches :) |
| erson | Tonyhgras, yes, if you need that many ports, yes |
| Dell-BrianS | Wait until our 4.0 documents come out. ;=) |
| erson | Make sure you stack the two switches for best performance/redundancy |
| ceri | Erson, question is whether 24 DIMM slots in that space is more cost-effective or not. Almost certainly not if you're installing ESX on them, I guess |
| rogerlund | Think about this, you’re using iSCSI, which is a cheaper solution than FC, but do not push your luck too much. The Cisco switches will outperform the other options |
| tonyhgras | @brians, when can we expect that to happen? |
| Dell-BrianS | When choosing external switches, you have to figure out how many links you have from the chassis to the external switches, and then from the switches to the EqualLogic arrays |
| ceri | Dell-kongy, I've been comparing Dell, Sun, HP, and IBM, and, basically, if I can understand the interconnect documents, it makes it a lot easier to decide that I might want to buy it. IBM is a big lose on that point |
| erson | Rogerlund, Cisco will outperform in features, not so much at all in regard to performance |
| ceri | Dell-kongy, so such a session might well be a good idea |
| Dell-BrianS | I don't think I can comment on dates, but our Web site said coming soon... |
| tonyhgras | That's the point, Erson, is there any real performance advantage? |
| rogerlund | If you start losing packets or having performance problems because of your cheap switch, then what? Never have your infrastructure your weakest link? |
| erson | A switch doesn't lose packets just because its not the most expensive switch on the market |
| tonyhgras | @rogerlund, define cheap switches... |
| tonyhgras | Dell's 6224 or M6220 can get the work done, right? |
| rogerlund | Anything other than a Mitel, Cisco, etc. |
| erson | Tonyghras, for sure |
| Dell-BrianS | A long time ago, we chose the Cisco over PowerConnect for our bundles. One reason is because EqualLogic had not certified the PowerConnect. Now they have, and I see that as significant when choosing which switch |
| ceri | If the buffers are deep enough to deal with bursts then you're probably just fine |
| rogerlund | I had a Dell engineer tell me once not to use Dell; not say anything bad about them—this was with a PS 3000 series demo. |
| tonyhgras | Well can the 6224, for example, handle the traffic to three or four EqaulLogics? |
| Dell-BrianS | I think that goes back to those early firmware versions. We use PowerConnect for all our infrastructure, and only add a few Cisco switches for specific bundle testing. I have been happy with the PowerConnects |
| tonyhgras | The price difference is huge |
| rogerlund | You want something that can handle maxed throughput all the time, without maxing the CPU |
| erson | Shuffling packets at wire speed isn't particularly hard these days...the problem is all the features in the switches |
| tonyhgras | Seems kind of a waste to me to use 10K switches for the iSCSI network |
| rogerlund | I mean, if you spend 30K–60k times 5 for five for SANs, what’s 10k–15k x 2 for two 10GbE switches? |
| Dell-BrianS | Normally, your iSCSI bottleneck will be the back-end storage array, and not the network |
| Dell-KongY | We're getting close to closing time |
| erson | That’s why you pay for features when getting Cisco, Extreme, HP...you get the performance with pretty much every brand. In the enterprise switch segment there are very few bad eggs |
| Dell-KongY | I'd like to thank everyone for joining this chat, especially Brians from the VSE team. Thanks Brian! |
| ceri | Yes, thanks Brian |
| erson | Great job Brian! |
| Dell-BrianS | I think the feature set of the PowerConnect and the Cisco blade switches are similar |
| rogerlund | Follow me on twitter. Rogerlund |
| Dell-KongY | Thanks everyone for your questions and insights |
| DELL-ScottH | Hey, am I late for the chat? |
| Dell-KongY | Erson, as always, you are $$$ :) |
| erson | Hmm, need to find that review on the 6248 and equivalent switches from HP, Extreme, Cisco, and I think two more |
| Dell-KongY | Thank you Puneet |
| ceri | Agreed there too, thanks Erson |
| erson | Scotth, at least for the official chat yes...so it's a perfect time to spill the beans on the PC road map :) |
| DELL-ScottH | Lol |
| tonyhgras | Thanks everybody; this was a really interesting chat |
| rogerlund | Follow my blog: rogerlunditblog.blogspot.com |
| Dell-KongY | Oh, don't forget to join Jeffs on Thursday for a chat on iSCSI security and best practices |
| tonyhgras | Scotth, when will we have the transcript? |
| erson | I'm obviously there...sounds like a great chat |
| Dell-KongY | Come with your questions; we have the director, the strategist, and the technologist! |
| Dell-BrianS | In the lab we use *.*.*.* ;=) Is there a better way? |
| Dell-KongY | www.delltechcenter.com/page/07-02-09+iscsi+security+and+best+practices |
| Tonyhgras | Can we have a second part on this topic once the documents for 4.0 will be out? |
| Dell-KongY | @tonyhgras, sure |
| Dell-BrianS | That sounds good |
| Dell-KongY | And we'll have Brian come back once those documents go live |
| tonyhgras | Excellent |
| Dell-KongY | Also, transcript of this chat will be available some time tomorrow |
| erson | /me waves his Hyper-V flag |
| tonyhgras | Thanks Kongy |
| Dell-KongY | This was an open virtualization iSCSI talk; Hyper-V, Xen Server, and vSphere were all fair game |
| ceri | Okay, g'night all. See you Thursday |
| Dell-KongY | But we did have a fruitful talk on interconnects and switches |
| Dell-KongY | G'nite Ceri |
| Dell-KongY | Your welcome, Tonyhgras |
| erson | Windows Server 2008 R2 will be RTM shortly with lots of new Hyper-V features, so you could probably bundle that with chat for the 4.0 documents regarding network, interconnects, and so forth |
| Dell-KongY | @erson, it's like you know the Dell road map or something like it ;) |
| erson | /me has an NDA in his back pocket; I do wish /me would work in this chat. I'm severely IRC damaged obviously |
| Dell-BrianS | Goodnight, I need to go finish some edits on a document or something |
| Dell-KongY | Thanks again, Brian |
| tonyhgras | Okay, goodnight everybody, have a nice Canada day... |
| erson | /me is dreaming of a double-width, full-height eight-CPU Nehalem-ex blade |
| Dell-KongY | @erson, me too |
| erson | With 16 DIMM slots per socket |
| Dell-KongY | He he |
| erson | Hmm, guessing it would be hard to fit though |
| Dell-KongY | And hard to cool :( |
| erson | Yes. I've seen some bits pointing toward it; will be possible to have dual-socket Nehalem-ex |
| Dell-KongY | And it would sound like a 747 taking off every time it was loaded :) |
| erson | I'm assuming some Nehalem-ex blade is in the works since it will for sure be an awesome CPU |
| HoosierCAB | Guess I'll be reading the transcript; stupid payroll system |
| Dell-KongY | Sorry to hear that, Hoosiercab |
| erson | Awesome chat today, everyone! Hope to see you all (and you who are reading this transcript) on July 2 at 3 PM CDT to talk about iSCSI security and best practices. Bedtime here in Sweden, so goodnight |
TDA-Terry |
Latest page update: made by TDA-Terry
, Aug 11 2009, 12:27 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by TDA-Terry
view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lwebb82 | Dell 6248 ring network not working | 0 | Sep 25 2009, 6:41 PM EDT by lwebb82 | ||
|
Thread started: Sep 25 2009, 6:41 PM EDT
Watch
the Dell 6248 ring network has a bug/flaw. It took down our site a few times for a couple of hours each time. Any suggestions?
|
|||||