Sign in or 

5/21/2008 - Chat Transcript - Selecting the Right Server for Virtualization
Server Decision Matrix Wiki
VMotion Compatibility for Dell Servers
Virtualization Frontier Blog
| Dell-ToddM | Hello Bridgieb78 | |
| DELL-ScottH joined. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | Welcome Scott | |
| DELL-ScottH | Hey Todd ! | |
| Dell-ToddM | We're going to wait until a few minutes after the hour to get started | |
| Dell-ToddM | This gives everybody a chance to get connected | |
| Dell-ToddM | bridgieb78 - If there is anything specific that you want to chat about we can chat about it a bit now | |
| bridgieb78 | Nope, I'm just waiting to hear what you guys have to say. ::smile | |
| DELL-ScottH | usually talking about the best places for lunch :-) | |
| Dell-ToddM | Speaking of lunch | |
| bridgieb78 | I saw that the topic is which servers to get for virtualization. I am under the impression that lots of memory, quad-core Cpu systems with good I/o is the way to go | |
| Dell-ToddM | I think that Chuy's deserves a mention here | |
| Dell-ToddM | Yes - You are correct about quad-core and lots of Ram | |
| Dell-ToddM | The problem is that is now a description of most of our servers | |
| bridgieb78 | any specific suggestions when it comes to Dell servers - model, ram and Cpu? | |
| Dell-ToddM | Yes - I do have some suggestions / recommendations | |
| Dell-ToddM | Let me offically start the chat | |
| DELL-ScottH | Todd, roger just called, he can't get on from Parmer, I think Dell It has shut down the chat ports | |
| Dell-ToddM | Welcome to the Techtuesday chat on Selecting a Virtualization Server - 2-socket or 4 Sockets | |
| Dell-ToddM | I guess that Dell It was busy over the long weekend | |
| DELL-ScottH | guess so, maybe we'll get more customers, and they can view the transcript later | |
| Dell-ToddM | bridgeieb78 - There is no one single server that I can recommend for all. | |
| Dell-ToddM | It depends on what your virtulization requirements are | |
| Dell-ToddM | How many Vms and Servers you will have | |
| bridgieb78 | well, with an average workload and 20 Vms runing on an Esx server, say | |
| Dell-ToddM | So it is really more of a process where, the more info you get - the better a decision you can make | |
| bridgieb78 | yeah | |
| Dell-ToddM | So lets go through your specifics | |
| Dell-ToddM | What types of workload will be running in the Vms? | |
| Dell-ToddM | When Vms will be running basically a legacy consolidation workload - where older Physical servers have been migrated into Vm | |
| Dell-ToddM | A higher number of Vms can be run on a single server | |
| bridgieb78 left. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | When the Vms are running Exchange 2007 or Sql Server workloads - there could be as few as 2 | |
| Dell-ToddM | Additionally, the type of workload running can dictate how much you care about high availability | |
| Dell-ToddM | With Test and Dev - an outage of several hours may be no big deal | |
| Irina_diaz joined. | ||
| DELL-ScottH | welcome irina | |
| Dell-ToddM | Exchange typically needs to be up all the time - with downtime measured in seconds | |
| Dell-ToddM | Welcom Irina | |
| DELL-ScottH | use "action .. recent room history" to catch up on the chat | |
| Irina_diaz | Thanks! | |
| Dell-ToddM | We were just chatting about how Vm workload type can play a role in deciding what type of server to select | |
| dell-marc joined. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | But - we would really rather talk about what you want to talk about | |
| DELL-ScottH | hey marc | |
| dell-marc | yo! | |
| Dell-ToddM | Marc - Welcome | |
| Dell-ToddM | We have had some technical difficulties getting people connected it appears | |
| Dell-ToddM | Any problem for you? | |
| Dell-ToddM | So | |
| Dell-ToddM | The short of it is that there are lots of things that can be part of the decision of what server to use for virtualization. | |
| Dell-ToddM | I think that the three most people end up picking between are 2-socket, 4-socket, and blades | |
| Dell-ToddM | Today we are focusing on the 2 vs 4 socket part of the question | |
| Dell-ToddM | The two 2-socket servers are the 2950iii and R805 | |
| Robby joined. | ||
| DELL-ScottH | hi robby | |
| Dell-ToddM | The 2950iii is intel based and leads the Vmmark performance benchmark for 2-socket servers | |
| DELL-ScottH | use "action" ... "recent room history" to catch up | |
| Dell-ToddM | The R805 is Amd based, has twice as many Dimm slots and onboard Nics as the 2950iii | |
| Dell-ToddM | The R805 was designed for virtualization and that is why it has so much Ram and I/o while still maintaining a 2U form factor | |
| DELL-ScottH left. | ||
| DELL-ScottH joined. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | On the four-socket server side the two systems are the R900 and R905 | |
| Dell-ToddM | Their specs are very similar - except the R900 is Intel based and the R905 is Amd based | |
| dell-marc | What are the Nic specs for these? | |
| Dell-ToddM | 2950iii - 2 onboard Nics | |
| Robby | As far as virtualization is concerned, are there any major benchmark differences between intel and amd? | |
| Dell-ToddM | R805, R900, R905 - 4 onboard Nics | |
| Robby | What are the number of available expansion slots between the 2950 and 900 platforms? | |
| Dell-ToddM | The Intel systems lead the Amd systems by a little bit in the Vmmark benchmark | |
| Dell-ToddM | The link to the Vmmark site - is www.vmware.com/products/vmmark/results.html | |
| Dell-ToddM | The 2950 has three Pci slots, The R900 has 7 Pci | |
| Dell-ToddM | I've put together a wiki page that summarizes the server specs side by side - www.delltechcenter.com/page/virtualization+server+decision+matrix | |
| Dell-ToddM | Be sure to right click to follow these links - so you don't get disconnected from the chat | |
| DELL-ScottH left. | ||
| DELL-ScottH joined. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | Robby - Are you only looking at Intel based servers? | |
| Dell-ToddM | There is the issue of Vmotion compatibility that sometimes leads people to stick with one processor type | |
| Robby | we've actually settled on the r900s. | |
| Dell-ToddM | I really like the R900 that we have in our lab - because it has 128gb of Ram | |
| Dell-ToddM | How cool is that? | |
| Robby | you've got to love the scalable features that come along with the R900s. | |
| Dell-MarcF joined. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | I'm expecting to receive a couple of R805s this week - which will have 64GB or Ram each | |
| Dell-ToddM | The most amazing thing to me about this is the price of servers with 128 Gb and 64 Gb | |
| Dell-ToddM | The list price of the R805 with 64GB of Ram and top bin procs is under 10K (see dell.com - additional legal disclaimers inserted here :-) | |
| Robby | there really wasn't that much of a difference when we spec'd out the 32GB Ram and the 64 Gb Ram systems. | |
| Dell-ToddM | True - Ram isn't as big a driver of the cost of the server as it was in the past | |
| Irina_diaz left. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | Although if you put 128gb of Ram in an R805 - the price does go up quite a bit becuase it has to use the 8GB Dimms to get there | |
| Dell-MarcF | So what about 2 versus 4 core? What are the general cost differences between them? | |
| Dell-ToddM | You can basically get either 2 two-sockets or 1 four socket for about the same total hardware cost | |
| Dell-ToddM | The license cost for Vmware can be a difference - two-socket license for Vmware is less than half of a four-socket Vmware license | |
| Dell-MarcF | socket 2 me | |
| Robby | that's pretty good | |
| Dell-ToddM | From an availability standpoint, two-sockets are much more affordable | |
| Dell-ToddM | As it is less expensive to have N+1 | |
| Dell-ToddM | When the +1 is a two-socket server instead of a four-socket server | |
| Dell-ToddM | This becomes less of an issue in larger deployments, but if you are only going to have 2 or 3 servers | |
| Dell-ToddM | Then it can be a big difference | |
| Dell-ToddM | Part of this availability or disaster conversation is the egg basket issue | |
| Dell-ToddM | How many eggs do you want to put in one basket? | |
| Dell-ToddM | This really becomes a comfort level question with Vmware Ha or clustering | |
| Dell-ToddM | How fast can you recover or failover an entire server worth of Vms? | |
| Dell-ToddM | There isn't a right or wrong answer to this question - it is more of an opinion in how to run a farm of virtualization servers | |
| Dell-ToddM | One area that doesn't get as much attention as it did about a year ago is power consumption. | |
| Dell-ToddM | It can be more power efficient to use two-socket servers as they have higher performance per socket than four-socket servers | |
| Dell-MarcF | Todd you mentioned vmotion compatibility between intel and amd. Are there known problems with this? | |
| Dell-ToddM | Today - you cannot Vmotion between Amd and Intel servers | |
| DELL-ScottH | http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/solutions/vmotion_compatibility_matix.pdf | |
| Dell-ToddM | Even between servers of the same processor type (intel or Amd) you must be using the same generation to do Vmotion | |
| Dell-MarcF | Have I been asleep for not knowing this? Is this gernal knowledge? | |
| Robby | this is somewhat true on different chip platforms within the same manufatcurer, correct? | |
| Dell-MarcF | Ok, so I've been sleeping. | |
| Dell-ToddM | As you can see in the chart that Scott linked to , there are even cases where you can't Vmotion between the same generation of Dell Server | |
| DELL-ScottH | Marc, it's uber technical :-) ... you being the storage guy ... it's all just ball bearings to you :-) | |
| Dell-MarcF | Oooooooooooohhhhhhh | |
| DELL-ScottH | 1's and 0's | |
| Dell-ToddM | There is some effort under way to make these issues go away with future generations of processors and virtualization software - but the arrival date of this is unkown | |
| Dell-ToddM | Why does the word uber keep coming up today? | |
| Dell-MarcF | Simple matter of programming | |
| DELL-ScottH | I don't know I think we are trying to make it our own ... like the Vps have "laser-focus" and "synergy" .. we want "uber" | |
| Dell-ToddM | Yes - we should try to make uber a part of every chat | |
| Dell-MarcF | rhymes with tuber | |
| DELL-ScottH | uber-cool | |
| Dell-MarcF | a great potato is an uber tuber | |
| DELL-ScottH | lol | |
| Robby | is this how most of the sessions wind down :-) | |
| DELL-ScottH | usually | |
| Dell-ToddM | Sometimes - esp after long holiday weekend | |
| Dell-MarcF | but it grows under ground! | |
| DELL-ScottH | Todd ! Uber me ! .. I'm capping the point ! | |
| Dell-ToddM | Robby - Anything else you want to ask / discuss? | |
| Robby | no i'm good. thanks | |
| Dell-ToddM | I would also like to thank Marc for padding our numbers and logging in twice! | |
| DELL-ScottH | yeahhh ! marc ! | |
| Dell-MarcF | my brouser frozer | |
| Robby | i noticed scott logging in and out several times. | |
| Dell-MarcF | ice old java | |
| DELL-ScottH | I accidently clicked on a link | |
| Robby | take care | |
| Dell-MarcF left. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | Due to some problems with getting conected and the holiday weekend - I think attendance was a bit low today - so we need number padding! | |
| Robby left. | ||
| DELL-ScottH left. | ||
| Dell-ToddM | Join us next week when we will chat about using blades for virtualization. | |
| Dell-ToddM | Thanks to all! |
|
todd_muirhead |
Latest page update: made by todd_muirhead
, May 28 2008, 11:11 AM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
view changes - complete history) |
|
More Info: links to this page
|